This is why many websites use it to hold their content and media files, which may be served efficiently from AWS CloudFront. Files stored within an S3 bucket can be accessed programmatically or directly from services such as AWS CloudFront. Unlike EBS or EFS, S3 is not limited to EC2. Using an EFS file system, you can configure instances to mount the file system.įinally, Amazon S3 is an object store good at storing vast numbers of backups or user files. It can be used as a common datasource for any application or workload that runs on numerous instances. Amazon EFS offersscalable file storage, also optimized for EC2. It stores data on a filesystem which is retained after the EC2 instance is shut down. Let’s take a closer look at the key features of each option, as well as the similarities and differences.ĪmazonEBS delivers high-availability block-level storage volumes for Amazon Elastic Compute Cloud (EC2) instances. What’s the Difference Between Amazon EBS vs EFS vs S3?Īmazon EFS, Amazon EBS, and Amazon S3 are AWS’ three different storage types that can be applicable for different types of workload needs. This will make it easier to pick the best solution to support your business objectives and storage needs. We'll explore each solution’s unique benefits and uses. To answer this question, we’ll explore the differences between Amazon Elastic Block Store (Amazon EBS), Amazon Elastic File System (Amazon EFS), and Amazon Simple Storage Service (Amazon S3). To achieve peak efficiency, you must match your computing, application, and processing needs to the appropriate storage technology. The storage strategy you choose plays a major role in the performance you receive, as well as the costs you’ll expend.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |